Law soon banning online games like rummy and poker: Tamil Nadu Minister of Justice
A day after the High Court of Madras overturned a recent amendment to Tamil Nadu’s gambling law, passed in 1930, which imposed a ban on online games with stakes like rummy and poker, Tamil Nadu’s law minister, S Ragupathy, said new legislation will be passed to ban gambling in the State.
In a statement, Ragupathy said: “Following the request of the chairman of the DMK and the chief minister, Deputy Stalin, the then-ruling AIADMK government urgently adopted an amendment to the law on November 21, 2020 to ban the online rummy game.
He added: “Although the government expressed its view on the online gambling ban, the High Court said that the government did not specify enough reasons when the law was passed and without formalizing the rules. rules, online games cannot be banned. “
Ragupathy said that since the public welfare is important, as soon as the order was issued by the court, Stalin asked to clearly define the rules, guidelines and reasons required. “A new law banning games like online rummy would soon be passed,” Raghupathy said.
On Tuesday, the First Bench of Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy overturned the amendment and cleared a batch of PIL from Junglee Games India Private Limited and others.
“By imposing a comprehensive and far-reaching ban, the least intrusive criterion was violated and the ban was thus violated in Article 19, paragraph 1, point g) of the Constitution (right to exercise any profession, or to carry on any activity, trade or business), ”said the bench.
He added: “The impugned legislation must be seen as something capricious and irrational. It was excessive and disproportionate… This court therefore annuls the amendment in its entirety as ultra vires the Constitution.
The bench, however, gave the state the freedom to pass other legislation without any loopholes. He added: “… nothing in this judgment would prevent the state government from introducing appropriate legislation confronting the constitutional principles of propriety.”
– with PTI inputs